In regards to LIVE, it has been much longer than a year's headstart.
That could be Dark Horse. It takes its inspiration from games like GOW, but it finds it own way. Dante may fail by being too much like GOW.
"Police Box in the XBox Bandit"
Saaking declared Sony the winner for 2008 to infinity, based it on the fact Sony has more first party, and quickly left the conversation.
Then there's this influx of comments and ire directed at Saaking. Some posting multiple times. Saaking really has taken your guys' power.
is a shareholder. We need people to invest in the economy right now. Wall Street may be the source of these woes. But shareholders...that's Main Street. That's me.
...a quick wooden ruler to the feet for about 30 seconds each and you won't be walking on them for about ten minutes. That was up until I was about 8. Thanks Mom!
Hell with this kid.
He was 13 and didn't listen to the adult in charge. Regardless of whether you agree with her judgment, he didn't listen. Likely he was reprimanded, and he was smacked upside the head for it. Good...I don't care if she's drunk. I'm 36 years old and still get smacked upside the head. You obey your elders until you're an adult. Then...well you choose your battles.
But this little punk fights back. Now most of us are guys, but some teens - even 1...
1. GOWIII
2. DC Universe Online
3. Max Payne 3
4. Heavy Rain
5. L.A. Noire
6. Rage
7. Modnation Racers
8. Twisted Metal
9. Enslaved
10. Dark Void
Bayonetta is more in the vein of a DMC, while...well we all know where Dante draws its inspirations, and I'm not talking about the novel.
I don't see too much difference between the demo and DMC. The gameplay was fun, but the cameras were offputting. The dancing was nauseating. Other than that I don't think I would say this is truly 'next gen' over DMC4.
Microsoft has replicants?
...
maybe they'll keep it to 3 discs.
will provide an extra CPU to the 360 for something other than motion control. I don't think it will be this Trojan Horse you are talking about.
In essence, you will have two consoles. You will have those with Natal and those without. Those without won't be able to play games that require optimized performance. Devs wouldn't be able to use any extra power. Would MS require Natal for its core games, otherwise making 360 obsolete to those without it?
I'm calling ...
until it comes out, but I have little faith that it will be the revolution that Microsoft says it would be. I don't let PR and "smoke and mirror" demos tell me what I need to know about a product.
nothing really to be made at them about here. We still bought 'em like flapjacks.
It would have made a more reasonable DLC offering. Still it was a win-win.
it mostly speaks to their current knowledge, skills and abilities...rather than the console.
leaving disagrees. No one likes to think they are missing out.
Game Designers ultimately make the graphics; the console only sets the limits. Those limits are only discovered by designers testing their ingenuity making me games,...okay us games.
Buy it because of everything else non-hardware related. Microsoft knows it strength - LIVE. This is especially for those who equate gaming mostly with online multiplayer shooters. I would argue that it is the second or third largest gaming genre in America.
Plus I believe American PC gamers feel more of an affinity to the XBox. I think the similarity in architecture has made the 360 a console 'brother' to the PC.